Concrete Resurfacing – Repair of Concrete Floor or Pavement Surfaces

Concrete resurfacing is a way of restoring a worn or damaged concrete floor or pavement surface so that it can be used again without having to rebuild the entire structure. It is vital to undertake an evaluation of the current surface before undergoing any type of treatment as part of concrete resurfacing. This assessment will determine whether the existing layer meets certain design criteria. As previously said, some factors must be taken into account prior to having resurfacing. They are as follows. In order to provide the required service, the existing layer must be thick enough. Longitudinal and transverse joints may exist in the concrete surface. These joints must be capable of smoothly transferring load to the underlying layer (Soil).

Resurfacing Evaluation of Existing Concrete Floors or Pavements

The splits or cracks exist through the resurfaced layer or through the underlying pavement and the resurfacing must limit the passage of fine solids or moisture. The reinforcement must be adequately covered in order to withstand severe exposure conditions. In order for the crack present to be tight, the reinforcing must have a size and spacing. The maximum aggregate size used in the service is determined by the resurfaced layer thickness and steel spacing. Good and long-lasting aggregates must be used. It is recommended to have air entrainment in regions where there is a risk of freezing and thawing problems. De-icing can also be accomplished with the application of salts.

To minimise shoulder materials infiltrating between the underlying pavement and the resurfacing layer, the material utilised for shoulder construction must be either concrete or other stabilised materials. Resurfacing Evaluation of Existing Concrete Floors or Pavements As previously stated, prior to resurfacing methods, the condition of the existing pavement must be assessed. The following are the three basic elements of a pavement evaluation: The functional condition, often known as the serviceability condition, is assessed. Surveys are used to assess the level of suffering. Structural Testing is a method of evaluating a building’s structural integrity. The three criteria described do not have to be mutually exclusive. They might appear on their own or as a grouping in an existing pavement. This phenomenon occurs in a unique way.

The Old Surface’s Functional Adequacy

Understanding the exact state of the existing pavement or surface is the most important consideration in choosing the optimal overlay choice. The actual assessment must depict how it will behave when a fresh overlay is applied over the old one. This condition is determined by structural rather than functional criteria. The following are the main elements to consider when evaluating existing pavements: The Old Surface’s Functional Adequacy The state of a concrete surface that has been subjected to traffic is primarily connected to its serviceability. Based on the ride quality, this is the state of the pavement. Panel ratings are used in the evaluation technique. Some agencies judge based on the quality of the ride. The response type ride quality measurements are one such example.

Due to the original surface’s functional inadequacies, an overlay surface may be given. This surface can be provided to increase the surface’s skid resistance. A functional overlay can be used when the pavement surface does not follow one or more levels of service. The minimum thickness of the overlay surface for functional overlay shall be the thickness required for construction convenience or to bring the surface to an acceptable level of service. Surveys of Distress Distress surveys can be used to determine the nature and extent of damage to the existing layer. This information gives us an indication of the resurfacing layer’s performance. As part of the survey, various methodologies are used. However, there is a conventional technique.

Distress Surveys

The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and Concrete Pavement Evaluation System are the most widely used methods (COPES). For flexible pavement, the PCI approach is used. For concrete pavements, the COPES is employed. In the past, a guide called Highway Pavement Distress Identification Manual was utilised and followed. Adequacy of Structure To determine the structural adequacy of the current surface layer, non-destructive testing is used. This is done by evaluating the pavement’s response to the applied loads. There is a link between the nature of the response and the pavement’s structural soundness. Another method created by AASHTO is known as “remaining life.” As the name implies, this will assess the amount of life that is consumed by the pavement. The unit of measurement for consumption.

AASHTO has proposed yet another approach (Third Approach). The structural capability of the layer will be determined using distress surveys and the material parameters of the existing pavement. The Pavement or Floors’ Structural Design for Resurfacing When a structural deficiency is compared to a functional deficiency, the former will take precedence. This is because the thickness required to address the structural defect will be greater than the thickness required to solve the functional shortfall. There are numerous techniques to resurfacing thickness design. However, it entails determining the following requirements: Structural Capacity: Determination of the capacity that will account for current and projected future traffic over the design life.

Intersection of Concrete Layers

The difference between structural capacity and effective structural capacity is the effective structural capacity or in-situ structural capacity. Other Concrete Resurfacing Requirements The following are some of the other elements that will be of importance during the resurfacing: Intersection of Concrete Layers The area between the underlying layer and the overlay surface is formed by this. This is a crucial consideration in the design process. The interface determines the nature of the relationship. The performance of the entire resurfacing layer would be affected by this bonding.When it comes to interface materials, they primarily serve two roles. The interface material will either strengthen or weaken the bond between the underlying and resurfacing layers. They can also be utilised to distinguish between the underlying and resurfacing layers.

The first goal is to have the two layers behave as though they are one piece under load and transfer. The distinct elements will serve as separate elements for the second purpose. The second reason indicates that there is little or no link between the two layers. We have bonded resurfacing and unbonded resurfacing based on this.Resurfacing with a Bond To serve as a bond between the old and new layers, bonded resurfacing primarily employs plain cement concrete slurry or grout. A mobile mixer is used to prepare the grout.Portland cement and water were utilised as the primary ingredients. The water cement ratio is usually not more than 0.62. These are not used in some locations However, instead.

Unbonded Resurfacing

Unbonded resurfacing is typically employed in situations where the underlying layer is extremely weak and in need of repair. If a bond is formed between the new and old overlays in this situation, reflective cracking is considered to occur. This is due to tension being transferred from the weak bottom layer to the new top layer. As a result, an unbonded interface material is used in such instances. As a result, the two layers will act and perform independently. A variety of materials are available to create such a positive coating. Asphalt-aggregate mixtures of various types and polyethylene are among them. Other materials include wax-based curing compounds and liquid asphalts. Initially, a liquid asphalt layer is applied, followed by a polyethylene coating.

It is also required to use thick surfacing layers rather than thin surfacing layers. Reflective cracking in the overlay can also be caused by thin layers. The suggestions for asphalt unbonded surface layer providing in various conditions are shown below: If the underlying pavement has a joint or crack bigger than 6mm, as well as slab deterioration and spalling, an asphalt layer of at least 25mm thickness must be given.If the faulting and slab deterioration are not readily apparent, a thin layer of asphalt with a thickness of no more than 13mm is applied. Slurry seal materials with a nominal thickness of 3mm can also be used. This thin layer must have the ability to.

Also Check

Workforce Motivational Theories in Construction